Skip to main content
Back to blog

By On Point Tech Solutions

The Person Who Paid You And The Person You Served Are Not The Same Person

The Person Who Paid You And The Person You Served Are Not The Same Person

The check came from an insurance company four states away, signed by somebody who has never seen the house.

Meanwhile the homeowner stood in her driveway for two days watching the crew strip and rebuild her roof, brought out water nobody asked for, and told the foreman twice that she could not believe how fast it went.

So when the review request went out, it went to the billing contact. Which means it went to a claims department, where it will be ignored forever, and the person who actually watched the work happen was never asked at all.

This split is everywhere once you see it

A property manager pays and the resident is the one who met your tech. A parent pays and the teenager took the lessons. Same thing on a general contractor's job, or at a company where one employee is the person who actually called you at seven in the morning.

Two different people, one job, and only one of them has anything worth reading to say about it.

The payer experienced your paperwork. The timeline, the change order, the invoice, whether the number at the end matched the number at the start. That is a real experience and it is not the one that sells the next customer.

The person you served experienced the work. They know whether your guy explained what he was doing as he went, and they know who showed up at nine and who showed up at eleven.

Ask the payer and you get a review about accounting

This is the part that surprises owners the first time.

Send the request to the account holder on a job somebody else lived through and the review comes back about billing, if it comes back at all. Communication was good, invoicing was clear, would use again. Smooth and empty, the kind a stranger scrolls past without slowing down.

Worse is when the payer is a company. Then you are asking somebody to post publicly, from a personal account, about a vendor relationship that is not theirs to talk about. Most of them will quietly do nothing, and you will decide reviews do not work in your industry.

So ask the one who was there

Default to whoever was physically present when the work happened. That is the simplest version of the rule and it is right most of the time.

The practical problem is that your records usually point the other way. Your invoicing system knows the payer, because that is who it exists to bill. The name of the person who actually opened the door is on a work order, in a text thread, or in somebody's head.

Fixing that is not a software project. It is one field. Whoever writes the job up puts down the name and the mobile number of the person on site, separately from whoever is paying, and from then on the request has somewhere to go.

The thing they will say back

Expect some version of this: I did not pay for it, so is it weird for me to review you.

Tenants say it. So do homeowners on insurance jobs, and the adult child who was at the house while you worked on their mother's place. They feel like the receipt is what gives somebody standing to have an opinion.

The answer is short and it works. Tell them the review is about the work, not the bill. They are the one who saw it, so they are the only one who can describe it.

Two cases where you do not do this

When the payer is your actual repeat buyer, they matter more than any single resident does. A property manager with forty doors is a relationship, and what you want from them is not a Google review at all. It is a referral, a reference for the next bid, or a line you can quote with permission. Ask for that instead, and leave the public review to the residents.

When the person served is a minor, do not ask them. Ask the parent to describe what they watched, or ask whichever adult was in the room. Nobody needs a review from a fourteen year old, and you do not want to be the business that asked for one.

Do this

  1. 1Add one field to your job intake: the name and mobile number of the person who will be on site, separate from the billing contact.
  2. 2Make the review request go to that field by default, not to the account holder.
  3. 3Ask at the moment the work finishes, while the person who watched it is still standing there.
  4. 4When somebody says they did not pay so it feels strange, tell them the review is about the work and they are the one who saw it.
  5. 5For a payer who is a repeat buyer, ask for a referral or a reference instead of a public review.
  6. 6Never ask a minor. Ask the adult who was present.
  7. 7On insurance and warranty work, say out loud what you want described, because those customers often assume the whole thing was handled by somebody else and they have no part in it.
  8. 8Check your last twenty requests and count how many went to a billing contact who was never on site.

Where the card fits

The reason this keeps happening is that your invoicing runs on one set of contacts and your actual work happens in front of a different set of people, and only one of those two has a system behind it.

A tap card lives with the person doing the work, so the ask happens in the place where the right human is standing. The tech taps it for the resident at the door, on the spot, while the finished job is still in view. The invoice goes to the office later and nobody has to remember to chase anybody.

That is the whole fix. Put the asking in the hands of whoever is face to face with the person who watched. Cards and stands are at shop.optechsol.llc.

The short version

On plenty of jobs the person who pays and the person you serve are two different people, and your systems only know the payer. Ask the payer and you get a review about invoicing, or nothing at all. Ask the person who was on site and you get the detail that convinces the next reader. Record that person's number as a separate field, send the request there, and when they say they did not pay for it, tell them the review is about the work.